Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest
Quick answer
Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents) (Lumos) and SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) (SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt))) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents) (Lumos) and SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) (SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt))) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents) |  SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Lumos | SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt)) |
| HQ | United States · North America | Germany · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Compliance | Security, Code security |
| Summary | AI agent built into the Lumos identity governance platform that designs roles, completes access reviews (approve/flag with peer and usage analysis) and investigates identity risk, explaining every decision. | German autonomous pentesting product for web apps and APIs: given a target URL, scope and optional source code, its AI agents carry out real exploitation, a separate agent re-tests every finding against the live app to weed out false positives, and a compliance-ready report with proof-of-exploit and remediation steps arrives within 24 hours; continuous monthly runs mark findings fixed, regressed or new. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | ISO 27001, SOC 2 |
| Capabilities / tasks | identity governance, access reviews, risk assessment | pen test management, appsec, vulnerability management, attack surface |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Published on squr.ai/pricing: Compliance Pentest EUR 1,995 one-time per web app/API (24h, free retest); Professional continuous EUR 995 per app per month; bulk credits EUR 1,495 per pentest for 10+ apps; free attack-surface scan. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.lumos.com/products/albus | https://squr.ai/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://www.lumos.com/products/albus | https://squr.ai/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force and SQUR Autonomous Pentest?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force-only tasks: identity-governance, access-reviews, risk-assessment. SQUR Autonomous Pentest-only tasks: pen-test-management, appsec, vulnerability-management, attack-surface. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents): Not published SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification): Published on squr.ai/pricing: Compliance Pentest EUR 1,995 one-time per web app/API (24h, free retest); Professional continuous EUR 995 per app per month; bulk credits EUR 1,495 per pentest for 10+ apps; free attack-surface scan.
Where are Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force and SQUR Autonomous Pentest headquartered?
Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents) publishes HQ in United States. SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) publishes HQ in Germany.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents) or SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents) alternatives
- SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents)
More SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)