Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation vs StackHawk Wingman
Quick answer
Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation (Mend.io (White Source Ltd)) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation (Mend.io (White Source Ltd)) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation |  StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Mend.io (White Source Ltd) | StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.) |
| HQ | Israel · Middle East | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | AI capabilities in the Mend AppSec platform: Agentic Triage uses an LLM to classify each SAST finding as true positive, false positive or inconclusive with an evidence breakdown and exploitation path, and AI code remediation proposes fixes that can be turned into a pull request from GitHub, the PR check or Jira. | Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management, pr review | appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations |
| Integrations (vendor-listed) | GitHub.com, Azure DevOps Repos, Bitbucket Cloud, Jira, Mend CLI | Not recorded in this dataset yet |
| Pricing (as published) | Published 'up to' list prices: Mend AppSec up to USD 1,000 per developer/year; Mend AI up to USD 300; Mend Renovate Enterprise up to USD 250 (mend.io/pricing, checked 2026-10-29). | Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://docs.mend.io/platform/latest/code-findings-triage | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-29 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://docs.mend.io/platform/latest/code-findings-triage | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation and StackHawk Wingman?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation, vulnerability-management. Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation-only tasks: sast, pr-review. StackHawk Wingman-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation: Published 'up to' list prices: Mend AppSec up to USD 1,000 per developer/year; Mend AI up to USD 300; Mend Renovate Enterprise up to USD 250 (mend.io/pricing, checked 2026-10-29). StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents): Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales.
Where are Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation and StackHawk Wingman headquartered?
Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation publishes HQ in Israel. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 37 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation alternatives
- StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation
- Apiiro Guardian Agent (AutoFix and coding-agent protection) vs Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation
More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Apiiro Guardian Agent (AutoFix and coding-agent protection) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)