Qodo multi-agent code review vs StackHawk Wingman
Quick answer
Qodo multi-agent code review (Qodo (Codium Ltd.)) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Qodo multi-agent code review (Qodo (Codium Ltd.)) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Qodo multi-agent code review |  StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Qodo (Codium Ltd.) | StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.) |
| HQ | Israel · Middle East | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Agentic pull-request review platform (formerly CodiumAI) that flags bugs, security issues and rule violations with organisational context. A general code reviewer, not a dedicated SAST scanner. | Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pr review, appsec, code quality | appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations |
| Pricing (as published) | Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page. | Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/ | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/ | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Qodo multi-agent code review and StackHawk Wingman?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec. Qodo multi-agent code review-only tasks: pr-review, code-quality. StackHawk Wingman-only tasks: remediation, vulnerability-management, agent-platform-security-integrations. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Qodo multi-agent code review: Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents): Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales.
Where are Qodo multi-agent code review and StackHawk Wingman headquartered?
Qodo multi-agent code review publishes HQ in Israel. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Qodo multi-agent code review alternatives
- StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Qodo multi-agent code review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)