StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) vs Tembo
Quick answer
StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) and Tembo (Tembo Data Systems) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) and Tembo (Tembo Data Systems) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.) | Tembo Data Systems |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Business operations |
| Summary | Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. | Agent orchestration platform (not a dedicated AppSec scanner) that opens auto-fix PRs from Snyk vulnerability scans and Sentry production errors. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. | Published on tembo.io/pricing: free trial; Pro $60/month ($60 usage allowance, up to 5 users); Max $200/month (up to 10 users); Enterprise custom. Usage allowance covers Tembo Gateway tokens and cloud VM compute; overages optional on paid plans. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ | https://docs.tembo.io/integrations/snyk |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ | https://www.tembo.io/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between StackHawk Wingman and Tembo?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: remediation, agent-platform-security-integrations. StackHawk Wingman-only tasks: appsec, vulnerability-management. Tembo-only tasks: sca. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents): Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. Tembo: Published on tembo.io/pricing: free trial; Pro $60/month ($60 usage allowance, up to 5 users); Max $200/month (up to 10 users); Enterprise custom. Usage allowance covers Tembo Gateway tokens and cloud VM compute; overages optional on paid plans.
Where are StackHawk Wingman and Tembo headquartered?
StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) publishes HQ in United States. Tembo publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) alternatives
- Tembo alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
More Tembo comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Tembo
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Tembo
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Tembo
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Tembo
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Tembo