GitHub Copilot Autofix vs StackHawk Wingman
Quick answer
GitHub Copilot Autofix (GitHub) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
GitHub Copilot Autofix (GitHub) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  GitHub Copilot Autofix |  StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | GitHub | StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.) |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | LLM-generated suggested fixes for GitHub code-scanning alerts (CodeQL), plus agentic autofix (generally available 15 Oct 2026), where an alert is assigned to Copilot, which investigates, validates a fix and opens a pull request. Part of GitHub Code Security / Advanced Security. | Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management, pr review | appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations |
| Pricing (as published) | Included with GitHub Code Security. Public repositories: available at no extra Code Security licence. Private/internal repositories: GitHub Code Security is published at $30 USD per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans. Not a Copilot seat add-on; GitHub docs say no Copilot subscription is required. Agentic autofix (GA 15 Oct 2026) is usage-billed: AI Credits from the Code Security budget plus Actions minutes; requires a Copilot billing method. | Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. |
| Pricing model | freemium | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/autofix-for-code-scanning | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/autofix-for-code-scanning | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between GitHub Copilot Autofix and StackHawk Wingman?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation, vulnerability-management. GitHub Copilot Autofix-only tasks: sast, pr-review. StackHawk Wingman-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
GitHub Copilot Autofix: Included with GitHub Code Security. Public repositories: available at no extra Code Security licence. Private/internal repositories: GitHub Code Security is published at $30 USD per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans. Not a Copilot seat add-on; GitHub docs say no Copilot subscription is required. Agentic autofix (GA 15 Oct 2026) is usage-billed: AI Credits from the Code Security budget plus Actions minutes; requires a Copilot billing method. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents): Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales.
Where are GitHub Copilot Autofix and StackHawk Wingman headquartered?
GitHub Copilot Autofix publishes HQ in United States. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- GitHub Copilot Autofix alternatives
- StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More GitHub Copilot Autofix comparisons
- GitHub Copilot Autofix vs Snyk
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)