Kiro vs StackHawk Wingman
Quick answer
Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) is tagged for FedRAMP.
| Field |  Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) |  StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Amazon Web Services | StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.) |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Agent platform with security integrations: AWS's agentic IDE and autonomous agent, with Kiro Powers for Snyk, Aikido, SonarQube and Sonatype scanning. | Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | FedRAMP | — |
| FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) | AWS GovCloud (Kiro in scope) · FedRAMP Authorized · F1603047866 · High · authorized 2016-06-21 | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | FedRAMP | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | agent platform with security integrations, appsec, pr review | appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check). | Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. |
| Pricing model | freemium | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://kiro.dev/powers/ | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://kiro.dev/powers/ | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Kiro and StackHawk Wingman?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations, appsec. Kiro-only tasks: pr-review. StackHawk Wingman-only tasks: remediation, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Kiro (agent platform with security integrations): Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check). StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents): Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales.
Where are Kiro and StackHawk Wingman headquartered?
Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) publishes HQ in United States. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) alternatives
- StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)