StackHawk Wingman vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI
Quick answer
StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) (Xygeni Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) (Xygeni Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) |  Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.) | Xygeni Security |
| HQ | United States · North America | Spain · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. | Agentic AppSec from Valladolid-based Xygeni: DevAI scans code in the IDE and generates validated fixes (including for AI-generated code), while CoreAI prioritises risk and orchestrates remediation PRs across the platform. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. | Free plan listed on xygeni.io/pricing; paid annual plans are priced by number of contributors and daily scans (amounts load dynamically and were not captured from the static page). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | freemium |
| Primary source | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between StackHawk Wingman and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation. StackHawk Wingman-only tasks: vulnerability-management, agent-platform-security-integrations. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI-only tasks: sast, sca, secrets-detection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents): Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec): Free plan listed on xygeni.io/pricing; paid annual plans are priced by number of contributors and daily scans (amounts load dynamically and were not captured from the static page).
Where are StackHawk Wingman and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI headquartered?
StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) publishes HQ in United States. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) publishes HQ in Spain.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) alternatives
- Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
More Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)